Itanagar, Aug 07: Arunachal Pradesh witnessed the imposition of prohibitory orders under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in the capital city, Itanagar, on August 7. The decision was taken in response to social activist Sol Dodum’s announcement of a peaceful dharma at Tennis Court, Itanagar, starting from the same day.
The District Magistrate of Itanagar issued a notice stating that no permission had been obtained from the Deputy Commissioner for the proposed dharma at Tennis Court. The administration expressed concerns that the sudden organization of the dharna could potentially create a nuisance and disrupt public peace, leading to the imposition of Section 144.
Section 144 is a legal provision that grants the local administration the authority to prohibit public gatherings, demonstrations, and other activities that may disrupt public order and tranquility. It is typically imposed in situations where there is a threat of violence or a potential breach of peace.
The decision to impose Section 144 in Itanagar reflects the administration’s efforts to maintain law and order in the region and prevent any untoward incidents that may arise from the proposed dharma. However, it has also sparked discussions and debates among citizens and activists regarding the right to peaceful protest and the need to strike a balance between public order and democratic rights.
Also Read: Sikkim Unrest: Tear Gas Used as Peaceful Rally Turns Violent in Namchi, Section 144 Imposed
Social activist Sol Dodum’s announcement of peaceful dharma highlights the ongoing concerns and issues faced by the people of Arunachal Pradesh. Dharma, a form of peaceful protest, has been used as a tool to express grievances and demands in the region for various social, political, and environmental causes.
While Section 144 is a crucial tool for the administration to avert potential threats to public safety, its imposition can also restrict the fundamental right to freedom of assembly and expression. As a democratic society, it is essential to strike a balance between maintaining public order and respecting the citizens’ right to peaceful protest and dissent.
In light of the situation, dialogue, and communication between the administration and activists become crucial to finding common ground and addressing the underlying issues that led to the call for peaceful dharma. Constructive engagement between the authorities and citizens can lead to a more inclusive and collaborative approach to resolving grievances and building a stronger society.
Arunachal Pradesh has been witnessing various social and political challenges. It is vital for the government to foster an environment that encourages open dialogue, transparency, and citizen participation in decision-making processes.
As the dust settles in the wake of the imposition of Section 144 in Itanagar, it is imperative for all stakeholders to come together and seek avenues for constructive conversations. By respecting the democratic rights of citizens while ensuring public safety, the region can find a way forward that upholds the principles of democracy and promotes harmony among its diverse communities.
The imposition of Section 144 in Itanagar underscores the delicate balance between maintaining public order and safeguarding democratic rights. The situation calls for a thoughtful and measured approach from all parties involved, emphasizing the importance of peaceful dialogue and understanding. By working together, the people of Arunachal Pradesh can navigate through the challenges and pave the way for a brighter and more inclusive future.
